I was looking for some research to support my argument in a comment I made on a recent blog post by Stephen, “Burstworking storm discussion“, when I stumbled across an article by Allen Bonde on The (New) Age of Knowledge Management. I got very excited when I read:
KM is back and is even returning to the spotlight as more lightweight, more focused “KM 2.0” tools make it easier to use and justify new investments
Allen makes lots of references to knowledge being everywhere – and rightly so! As Anne suggests in her post on Busy versus Burst workers, many employees (note that I don’t use the term web-worker though) increasingly using email, text messaging and even blogs and wikis as a way to communicate and share knowledge and information on a daily basis.
Allen then goes on to discuss the role of the CKO – the Chief Knowledge Officer – but it was then that I started to cry. I saw references to “new KM solutions” with the ability to “deal with both highly unstructured as well as structured information”.
While at a technology level Allen is right I think he’s off the mark somewhat, particularly given he refers to it as KM 2.0.
The fundamental principles of knowledge management (which Allen eventually gets to with his reference to the sorts of skills a CKO needs) are actually about supporting social environments that stimulate informal sharing of knowledge through developing processes that encourage more formal knowledge creation and exchange. Now that we’re seeing the social web evolve and we’re moving onto Web 2.0 I think it’s off the mark to suggest that these sort of tools equate to KM 2.0. This sort of think is the systems view of knowledge management that failed years ago. KM is not about the systems, but about the people and processes.
So has KM evolved to KM 2.0? No, not at all. KM is still about people and sharing knowledge. It’s always been about ensuring a supporting environment in which this can be best achieved. It’s never been about the technology because good KM can exist without it! It can even be about drinks with your IA colleagues once a month.
Yes, we’re currently seeing, through blogs and wikis, an environment in which knowledge management can be supported through technology. My message is, just don’t get confused between the two of them.
M










23 April, 2007 at 1:00 pm |
Matt,
I agree. I think that the wiki/blog/IM technology supports *Data* Management 2.0, but without the IA and KM thought, the technology is just a bunch of cool toys.
Cheers, Andrew
24 April, 2007 at 12:54 pm |
KM 2.0: Lightweight Knowledge Management
Matt writes: I was looking for some research to support my argument in a comment I made on a recent blog post by Stephen, “Burstworking storm discussion“, when I stumbled across an article by Allen Bonde on The (New) Age of Knowledge Managem
16 May, 2007 at 6:26 am |
There is a mindset in certain circles that believe technology or tools are the solution, which is what you touch here. Successful KM only comes with the right leadership, combined with the right tools. Currently, is awful the way tools are developed, super complex and without a design process. It is like building an airplane for 50 people, then marketing it for 500. Tools are not a solution. I like to go to the basics. What is the problem. What is the solution. Then, what are the tools=software to build it.
Great Blog.
Leonardo
20 July, 2007 at 10:37 pm |
Great post, KM failed in the early 90s when the focus was on getting a good ’system’ in place without thought to the change mgt/culture issues.
I do however believe that the increase in social networking and development of web 2.0 tools (and familiarity with them) that KM is now in a new phase that does bring enormous opportunities.
Cheers
Jenni
17 August, 2008 at 1:09 am |
[...] view of the difference between Web 2.0 and KM 2.0 comes from Matthew Hodgson, who posted a blog on April 23 that also stated the issue [...]
5 October, 2008 at 11:05 am |
[...] — I’ve changed my mind A little over a year ago I wrote a blog post on KM 2.0. In it I wrote: “… has KM evolved to KM 2.0? No, not at all. KM is still about people [...]
2 March, 2009 at 7:12 am |
[...] Matt points out in KM 2.0, KM has never been about the technology. The technology is just one tool to help unite people with [...]